So, you can toggle it in every conversation when needed. Rocket.Chat supports end-to-end encryption out of the box using the “ Off the record” feature conversations. But, with Slack, you only have the option to rely on a managed hosting option. Overall, with Rocket.Chat allows you to opt between a self-hosted option and a managed hosted plan. So, you might have to end up hiring an expert to set it up and maintain it for you.įortunately, Rocket.Chat also offers you a hosted option like Slack for a premium giving access to certain enterprise-grade features. Note that for some users, securing and deploying proper practices to secure their server can be a headache (if you are not experienced). With Rocket.Chat lets you control the data and any practices that help you secure your communications. You do not get control of it, but get access to some toggles to manage the workspace. Of course, Slack does not wildly steal any of your data, but technically, your data resides on someone else’s server. While it can be a hassle to self-host it, if you are someone who values data privacy more than the setup convenience, Rocket.Chat can be the perfect fit.įret not, we have a guide to help you self-host Rocket.Chat, if you prefer doing that.
Just for my opinion, I give Slack a bit of an edge here. With that being said, I would recommend trying both of them to check your preferences. With Slack, the user interface takes a modern approach (in other words, a feature-filled user experience).Ĭonsidering the mobile and desktop experience of Slack, it works great with its subtle animations and works pretty much flawlessly. It does not have any significant issues, but it may not be the most engaging experience for some. Things like searching for a particular message and a few subtle interactions aren’t the strongest points of Rocket.Chat.īut, if you like a simple and effective user interface that keeps up with the modern standards, Rocket.Chat is your friend. It does provide a good user experience, but as per my usage (for a few years now), I wouldn’t rate it as the “best experience”. Rocket.Chat offers a straightforward interface that is easy to use. You might want to check out Slack’s and Rocket.Chat’s pricing page to learn more about it. Generally, the pricing for premium subscriptions is almost similar, but it will differ per your organization’s requirements.
#Rocketchat logo free#
So, considering you already have an infrastructure in place, it should be free for you without any limit to its available features.īut, if you would rather not invest in a server to host it yourself, Slack gives you the free option.įurthermore, Slack does present you with some special regional pricing, which is not the case with Rocket.Chat. However, it would help if you had a server to deploy it to. Technically, you don’t need to pay a dime to use it. In comparison, Rocket.Chat is not entirely free to set up. We also have a guide on installing Slack on Linux to give you a head start. Slack, in this case, is free to get started with limited features. Of course, it depends on your preferences, but most users will prefer something free. Open-source or not, not everyone wants to invest in getting started. PremiumĪn essential factor for picking a team communication application includes the pricing. If you are on the fence about deciding on a good team communication app, let me compare the offerings to help you explore more about them. Is Rocket.Chat better than Slack? What benefits do you get if you use Slack over Rocket.Chat?
But, we have also had a fair share of experiences with Slack. We at It’s FOSS use Rocket.Chat (Self-hosted) for internal team communication. It is also available across all major platforms. Rocket.Chat, on the other hand, is one of the best open-source Slack alternatives. While it is not an open-source solution, it is available for Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS. Slack is arguably the most popular team messaging/collaboration application out there.
0 kommentar(er)
